Democracy in the eyes of Islamic
present, awareness of democracy everywhere in the world is aware of human awareness. That's why events like rallying, gathering, protests, and mass uprisings are happening in the world. Recently, the demolition of the socialist and autocratic system of Eastern Europe is its most burning example. Even the people of the Soviet Union, the birthplace of the socialist system, voices for freedom and democratic rights. The government has also fallen in our country through this mass movement. But what is the reason for people's emotions, interests, and bargains for democracy? For the sake of which people are in exchange for life, they are bound to establish democracy.
Regardless of the theoretical definition or explanation of democracy, we know that in the democracy, the state has the full power of the people, IE people's rule. In the words of Professor Seal, the government that is formed on the basis of all the share (share) democracy is what democracy is. (Democracy means a government in which everyone has shared). Again, McIvair said that the method of governing by majority or any other way is not democracy but how it governs democracy and how it governs (Democracy is not a way of governing whether by majority or otherwise, but primarily determining a way which governs And broadly to what, end) Similarly Abraham Lincoln has said, without the advice of other people, the right to rule other people of another (no man has a right of another man without other mans concept) elsewhere, the people's government, Government-run government and government for the people. | That's why the people elected or nominated by the people to form the government and govern them through the country so that they reflect the views of the people in all the activities of the government. With that, the assurance of the fundamental rights of the people, freedom of expression, freedom of expression, freedom of speech, independence of judiciary or rule of law etc.
However, the governments of all countries claim that they are fully democratic, whether it is President-ruled, parliamentary, dictatorship, socialist or monarchy. Although full democracy (100%) is not in any country. Because we consider the governments of the countries as 'models' or ideals of democracy, such as the United Kingdom or Britain, although there is a fairly full democratic advantage, minorities do not enjoy equal privileges in relation to religion and color; They have survived the support of South African racist and Israeli-Jewish government. Recently, during the war with Iraq in the Middle East, they imposed censorship on the news. Britain again Salman Rushdie (Holy Qur'an and Noor Mujassam, Habeebullah Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Sallam are protecting the name of his fictional slander) with freedom of expression and democracy. However, criticism of Christianity is banned in Britain.
Freedom of expression of freedom in democracy is acknowledged as the only absolute tolerance, but most of the politicians, poets, writers, journalists, professors, intellectuals, who are acknowledged as the stooges and proponents of so called democracy in our country, can be seen on any issue regarding Islam, fundamentalist, communal, reactionary, rajakarsa Enemies, etc. Now, if the original follower is fundamentalist, the followers of Islam, if the community and its adjutant are called reactionary to any communal, anti-Islam or reactionary person, and during the times of our freedom struggle, if some of the political parties, named Islam, Everyone is an enemy of Razakars or independence but it is a burden However, the interpretation of democracy and freedom of expression advocates of democracy acche say, Nevertheless, they are not like the Islam who are free to express themselves as militant and communal. Although 20 years before the liberation war, so what is the possibility of becoming the razakars for them between 30/35 years of age? And the names of Pakistan or Islamist parties are not Islam nor Islam documents, it is a matter of talking about Islam and talking to Pakistan or for those political parties. Moreover, there was no relation to religion with our liberation war or freedom struggle, only political and economic. So if these are condemned, considering the power of the so-called independence, Because by this there are many religions of this world, which mean only one religion's favor or narrow mentality. Although the present population of the world is more than 500 million and more than 125 million Muslims, which is 25 percent. And 64 countries in the United Nations 163 member countries are more than 28 percent of the Islamic Conference Organization (OIC). On the other side, we are proud of the Bengali nation and in this world there is a nation of Bengali people among the many nations. Likewise, Bangladesh is a country in many countries. Although the total number of Bengali's in the world is very high, only 20 crore is just 4 percent of the world's population and only one country as a country. So when the bangla or Bangladeshi nationalism is hoisted, the politicians, poets, litterateurs, journalists, professors and intellectuals are seen to be praised five times, just as minority communities (Hindu, Buddhist,
They have no headache or any commentary about communal violence in India, as if it is normal. And if there is any fault, then in their view it must be the Muslims. Because in India, Hindus do not have any problem and they do not have any problem. In fact, everyone is trying to fulfill his own interests, as Palestinians are terrorists to the United States and Afghan guerrillas like Mozena or freedom fighter On the other hand, the Afghans are terrorists and the Palestinians are the freedom fighter for Russia. What is the same democracy? And the real representation of the present democratic system is also questionable. Because in any election, it is possible to vote in the total voter 50/60 percent and the vote, which is divided among roughly 8/10 candidates, is very much if it gets very much 50/60 percent of the total votes cast. So it is seen, The person who wins has a representation of 25 percent of the total voter population with the support of the people. And only in our country, if we can sign the name is educated and that is the literacy rate where only 20/22% is the percentage. That is why the people of this country understand what democracy means.
We know that there are two good qualities of good things, in democracy also. And the proof of the argument, it is also difficult to define something through logic, since everybody has no reason to argue. We see in any debate competition that win-loss is not dependent on the subject, but the statement of the speaker is based on evidence or argument. Likewise, in the present democratic judicial system, the verdict of the trial depends on the skill of the lawyer, the plaintiff is not just like the defendant - for wrongdoing. A murderer who is acquitted on the basis of the legality of the murderer is acquitted and an innocent person is also punished. So good. Not only by the majority of the support of Majority support, but it also is not possible to find an evil, beneficial person, as well as logic, proof of evidence. Because human knowledge is limited, ignorance of the future, it is impossible for humans to determine good and bad. People just think of their own gain/loss, For example, it is beneficial to both by bribery or giving, but the cause of loss for society. It is said that every person has the right to gain or benefit from it, but in the case of greater interest or social harm, it is a matter of fact that alcohol, gambling, interest, murder, and deterioration etc. That is why Allah, the Holy Prophet, has shown the right way through the clear rules. And that's good for humans, though people do not understand.
There is no relation to Islam in present-day democracy. Because, where the state has the full power of the people, the people Although the teachings of Islam, Allah, he is the supreme power. According to the constitution of our country, no matter which law can be formulated or rejected by two-thirds of the members of parliament, whether it is contrary to Islamic law. For example, if two or three members of Parliament say that drinking alcohol is permissible, it will be considered as the law of the country. In Islam, there is no law outside the Qur'an, Hadith Sharif, Ijma and Qiyas. Females are equal in the fraternity of the men and women in the democracy and the principle of women's leadership is perfect, but in the case of Islam, two women are equal to one man and in no case does the girl accept the leadership of the man.
Therefore, in our country, who make Islamic politics in the name of democracy or democracy in the name of Islam, they are actually busy smiling their own interests by washing the people. Due to democracy, because of the human creation theory, there is no welfare in it anymore.
Special Article
No comments:
Post a Comment